WYGIWYG

  • 0 Posts
  • 545 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: September 24th, 2024

help-circle

  • Maybe.

    I think the pushback stems from a bunch of different things.

    It’s genuinely bad at some things. asking it to make a clock out of CSS and HTML is mostly awful.

    Historically, it’s been really bad at everything. So if someone hasn’t done a serious dive on it recently, they’re going to have the impression that it’s even worse than it really is.

    A lot of people don’t understand how to use it, a lot of times it’s like working with a monkey’s paw. You’ve got to pre-guess all the things that could go wrong and keep adding detail until it has no choice but to do it right. And even then, you have to come back and do iterations sometimes.

    It’s making a bunch of oligarchs extremely wealthy, for no good reason, on the backs of the working class, while we can barely buy RAM. At the same time, they’re burning through a hell of a lot of natural resources.

    They’re shoving options and features down our throats and making us pay for them even if we don’t want to use them.

    Some people are genuinely scared that corporations will use it to replace skiled labor with unskilled labor, which they are.

    I have seen advanced versions rewrite an entire cross-platform basic interpreter in a couple of tries.

    I lost a rather complicated Python program I wrote to manage projectors for my Halloween display. I had it make a framework. I went through all of my different options and modes one at a time and explained exactly how they needed to work. I recreated a couple of weeks of work in a couple of hours and added a significant number of features.

    It’s crap like make that admin page look good on a cell phone that’s absolutely bananas. That’s a feature I would never have the time to sit down and work on because it’s not that big of a deal. But it would literally be a day of trial and error on multiple test devices for me to write it myself.

    Would it be better received if it were marketed differently? Probably a little bit. But not beyond the things that I wrote about. It would be a subtle improvement in visibility I feel.



  • First: Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it.

    That’s a good idea to put first. Of course, like do no evil, priorities change, so we’ll need to keep a close eye on this.

    Second: our business model must align with trust. We will grow through transparent monetization that people recognize and value.

    Transparent is good, but if he things he’s going to add value to monetization, he’s smoking crack. There’s nothing we want from a browser that’s not already provided by a plugin.

    Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

    Nobody wants that. We already had all we wanted from them in trusted software.


  • I’m up to 45TB of actual used storage. I just want another tape analog. I want inexpensive, slow, long-term storage I can move off-site easily. This paying double to keep disks around and then moving them in boxes is just bad, and online storage is stupid expensive at those sizes.

    Was running on Backblaze for years until they screwed around with my client enough that I can’t backup my NAS reliably. I’m not a company, I’m not going to pay the cost of my disks every year to store the content of my disks.

    I’ve been considering for a few years standing up a 2u box in colocation.