• DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago
    • Claims in an interview that he is qualified to handle a social media company on the internet because he has “put internet in space”
    • Buys a financially struggling company for way too much money
    • Dismantles everything that made it attractive
    • Insults and fires the most competent employees who are trying to stop him from destroying the platform
    • Doesn’t pay the employees he fired owed severance, further discouraging the best of the workforce from ever applying to work there
    • Turned it into something so repulsive and toxic that the users and advertisers start to leave
    • Told the advertisers to “go fuck themselves”
    • Tried to sue the advertisers into returning, further discouraging any new advertiser from ever doing business with him
    • Destroys the brand recognition by renaming it to a letter of the alphabet he personally likes but nobody else gives a crap about
    • Abuses his admin powers to steal a handle with the name he wanted from its owner, further eroding the user’s trust in him handling the platform
    • Continues ruining the platform, turning it into his personal soap box to push his (toxic) ideas and abuses his powers to reduce the visibility of those he doesn’t like while claiming to be radically pro-free speech.
    • Alternative platforms have gained momentum and have reached critical mass and will soon become the new default platform people will flock to. High profile users leave.
    • Whines and bitches about the company not making any money.

    Hey guys, I’m starting to think that this guy’s fortune has absolutely nothing to do with his skills at running a business

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Did you include the whole ‘verified’ tag fiasco in your list? I didn’t see it explicitly in there, but maybe it falls under a general functionality fuck-up point.

    • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Hey guys, I’m starting to think that this guy’s fortune has absolutely nothing to do with his skills at running a business

      Great summary btw. and you are absolutely right here. He is a terrible manager.

      Remember the time when he slept at the Tesla factory just because he didn’t trust anybody and thought he himself must rescue it all by working so much overtime and make all the decisions.

      • btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        He is a terrible manager.

        I still can’t get over how Musk told computer programmers to print out hardcopies of all their source changes, and then fly to Musk’s city to show him the hardcopy. That alone proves Musk is the dumbest CEO of all time.

    • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Destroys the brand recognition by renaming it to a letter of the alphabet he personally likes but nobody else gives a crap about

      I’m beginning to suspect he only likes that letter because it’s the middle part of a swastika.

    • TheFriar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      Do we need a catchy “go Nazi get…____” catchphrase? It was such a g when the right wing did it! They do love a good catchphrase. Easier to remember.

      • Meron35@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Go nazi declare bankruptcy

        Redpilled? Get killed

        Go fash lose cash

        Lick boot, lose loot

        Go right eat shite

        All incel, no braincells

        Nazi salute, go destitute

        ADL? Common L

        Ku Klux? Lose bucks

        Go apartheid, all downside

        • TheFriar@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          A lot of people have pitched ideas, and this one is my favorite.

          Doesn’t rhyme and gets right to the point. This has my vote. Mocks the entire idea of having a cutesy catchphrase. But is a catchphrase in itself. And one that isn’t even catchy. Love it.

          • Tavi@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 days ago

            I’m gonna be that guy and say most of this misses the mark. The point of stupid catchphrases is to make it extremely obvious why something is wrong in a manner that is personally relatable to the audience, nuance be damned. Not only does this not do that, it implicitly agrees with the original premise. Let’s look at common examples and retorts.

            “Black lives matter” -> “All lives matter”

            The initial phrase is short punchy and too the point, but the retorts is as well. Instead of trying to address the issue, it reframes the original to give it a meaning that it doesn’t have. (Black lives matter too)->(Only black lives matter). An effective* retort, but not a cache phrase of its own, lest the person be caught looking “liberal”.

            “Global warming” -> “Look, a snowball/Why is it so cold?”

            This retort does the same thing by instead taking the words literal meaning and misinterpreting it deliberately, rather than engaging with the vast body of science that backs it up (our actions as humans have caused a consistent rise in global temperature averages which has caused ecological disasters and a financial apocalypse). The retort moves the perspective away from the original wide view point, and directs your personal attention to the “snowball/cold” (it’s cold, therefore it is not warm) despite being incredibly stupid, this comes off as smug to their team, so they are going to repeat it. Excellent thought termination.

            “Eat bugs” -> “Shrimp is bugs”

            Congratulations to all of you that remember the original lemmy raids and psyop posting, so I’ll go through this one for fun. This one stems from a right wing conspiracy theory claiming that due to impending food shortages all regular food will be given to rich elites and we will all be forced to eat bugs. Uhhhhh??? (Food anxiety, antisemitism?, “economic anxiety”/suffering under capitalism, invocation of gross) Shrimp is bugs succinctly acts as a retort because it reframes the issue. Bugs ain’t cheap (you won’t be forced to eat lobster???) Shrimp aren’t gross/unfamiliar (Don’t tell me you’ve never had seafood). Destroying a global cabal in under three words might take some workshopping. (half point for smug because it is stating the obvious)

            “Couch-fucker/Weird” -> no retorts yet …

            10/10 no notes lmao. Being verifiably false and still accurate gives you the smugness point off of the bat. “Weird” invokes the gross which reduces support for people that wear spray tan makeup. Couch fucker is both distinct and specific enough to to be remembered, succinct in criticizing Vance’s lack of charisma and hot-topic-esqe makeup, and cannot be easily misinterpreted without ceding the entire argument.

            “Go woke go broke” -> Go Nazi get shot?

            A retort should be:

            1. Be smug/obvious about it. (x)
            2. Make the people saying it seem gross/weird/weak. (x)
            3. Explain/refute/sidestep the issue. (x)
            4. Under 4 words/Writable with emoji. (✓)

            I’m much more fond of “Follow your leader” although that’s a general insult for people that are going mask off.

            Much more fond of something that is inherently dismissive of the point like “go sleepy, baby”. Always mock the fascist.