I find this move concerning, and wish that the Founder had looked for a new CEO that shared his values rather than a Private Equity and Mergers Expert.

Furthermore, the change to the GRIT motto is worrying. Trust is useless without Transparency when it comes to code and security.

  • ulkesh@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    199
    ·
    2 days ago

    Why the fuck does everything that’s good turn to shit? This world sucks. This timeline sucks.

      • Katana314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        Accumulation of power is a common motive regardless of political system. Money is just one way power gets expressed.

        Not claiming our system is perfect by any means. But this thought, to me, always felt like kicking the can down the road.

        • kazerniel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          I think there’s a difference though, in that capitalism rewards this kind of innate motive, while socialism doesn’t, so I think it would be much easier to build a system based on that that’s not fucked from the foundations like capitalism is. The societal benefits of capitalism always feel like an accidental side effect at most, when it should be at a heart of any economy system.

          Also it definitely seems that holding power over others warps the human mind, so I would definitely advocate for distributing policy-making power as evenly across the population as possible.

          • Katana314@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            19 hours ago

            A solution that stops evil people from being greedy for all of future society, gaming whatever our system is to hoard resources? No, I don’t.

            Whether under capitalism or socialism, either system would need frequent attention and intervention by thoughtful, socially responsible people to watch for abusers of the system.

            • Koarnine@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Right, but Capitalism incentivises this behaviour, thus making the checks and balances required both more robust and needing to be applied for regularly - while the powerful are capable of preventing this.

              On the other hand, Socialism has incentives that are completely different - managing the abusers would be a much simpler task.

        • ContactClosure@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          That might qualify as an argument but the enshittification of everything hasn’t gained anyone power, only money. Cuba was curing cancer before we started more war crimes in order to prove socialism doesn’t work, while we’re financing fast food.

    • perviouslyiner@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      2 days ago

      VC ruins everything

      This is literally a product where a hobbyist tried to fix a niche, and now the VCs arrive.

    • ripcord@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      61
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s not a timeline. It’s just the world we keep making. The only one.