• GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    The difference is that it’s intentional waters and the International Hydrographic Organization is in charge of standardizing the names.

    • RxBrad@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      The IHO proposes names which world nations may or may not use.

      Such is the case with the “Southern Ocean” around Antarctica since the early 2000s, which is randomly recognized & not recognized by world nations.

      • GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        It still requires Congress to pass legislation. I think they would have to leave the organization entirely or amend the resolution to join it and recognize it’s naming convention. The executive order is illegal.

        • RxBrad@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          I don’t disagree.

          But recent interpretation of the use of executive order is hurtling toward the president having near-monarch authority

          So, until the reach of executive orders gets reigned in… here we are.