Background: 15 years of experience in software and apparently spoiled because it was already set up correctly.

Been practicing doing my own servers, published a test site and 24 hours later, root was compromised.

Rolled back to the backup before I made it public and now I have a security checklist.

  • recklessengagement@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    This sounds like something everyone should go through at least once, to underscore the importance of hardening that can be easily taken for granted

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Permitting inbound SSH attempts, but disallowing actual logins, is an effective strategy to identify compromised hosts in real-time.

    The origin address of any login attempt is betraying it shouldn’t be trusted, and be fed into tarpits and block lists.

  • ohshit604@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    I can’t even figure out how to expose my services to the internet, honestly it’s probably for the best Wireguard gets the job done in the end.

  • DaCrazyJamez@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As a linux n00b who just recently took the plunge and set up a public site (tho really just for my own / selfhosting),

    Can anyone recommend a good guide or starting place for how to harden the setup? Im running mint on my former gaming rig, site is set up LAMP

  • Hozerkiller@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I’ve gotta say this post made me appreciate switching to lemmy. This post is actually helpful for the poor sap that didn’t know better, instead of pure salt like another site I won’t mention.

    • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I shared it because, out there, there is a junior engineer experiencing severe imposter syndrome. And here I am, someone who has successfully delivered applications with millions of users and advanced to leadership roles within the tech industry, who overlook basic security principles.

      We all make mistakes!

      • LordCrom@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        6 hours ago

        There’s a 40 year I.T. veteran here that still suffers imposter syndrome. It’s a real thing I’ve never been able to shake off

        • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Just look at who is in the White House, mate - and not just the president, but basically you can pick anyone he’s hand-picked for his staff.

          Surely that’s an instant cure for any qualified person feeling imposter syndrome in their job.

  • phx@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Had this years ago except it was a dumbass contractor where I worked who left a Windows server with FTP services exposed to the Internet and IIRC anonymous FTP enabled, on a Friday.

    When I came in on Monday it had become a repository for warez, malware, and questionable porn. We wiped out rather than trying to recover anything.

    • LordCrom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 hours ago

      If it’s public facing, how about dont turn on ssh to the public, open it to select ips or ranges. Use a non standard port, use a cert or even a radius with TOTP like privacyIdea. How about a port knocker to open the non standard port as well. Autoban to lock out source ips.

      That’s just off the top of my head.

      There’s a lot you can do to harden a host.

  • communism@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    11 hours ago

    How are people’s servers getting compromised? I’m no security expert (I’ve never worked in tech at all) and have a public VPS, never been compromised. Mainly just use SSH keys not passwords, I don’t do anything too crazy. Like if you have open SSH on port 22 with root login enabled and your root password is password123 then maybe but I’m surprised I’ve never been pwned if it’s so easy to get got…

    • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      11 hours ago

      By allowing password login and using weak passwords or by reusing passwords that have been involved in a data breach somewhere.

      • communism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That makes sense. It feels a bit mad that the difference between getting pwned super easy vs not is something simple like that. But also reassuring to know, cause I was wondering how I heard about so many hobbyist home labs etc getting compromised when it’d be pretty hard to obtain a reasonably secured private key (ie not uploaded onto the cloud or anything, not stored on an unencrypted drive that other people can easily access, etc). But if it’s just password logins that makes more sense.

    • pageflight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The one db I saw compromised at a previous employer was an AWS RDS with public Internet access open and default admin username/password. Luckily it was just full of test data, so when we noticed its contents had been replaced with a ransom message we just deleted the instance.

  • Punkie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Basic setup for me is scripted on a new system. In regards to ssh, I make sure:

    • Root account is disabled, sudo only
    • ssh only by keys
    • sshd blocks all users but a few, via AllowUsers
    • All ‘default usernames’ are removed, like ec2-user or ubuntu for AWS ec2 systems
    • The default ssh port moved if ssh has to be exposed to the Internet. No, this doesn’t make it “more secure” but damn, it reduces the script denials in my system logs, fight me.
    • Services are only allowed connections by an allow list of IPs or subnets. Internal, when possible.

    My systems are not “unhackable” but not low-hanging fruit, either. I assume everything I have out there can be hacked by someone SUPER determined, and have a vector of protection to mitigate backwash in case they gain full access.

    • feddylemmy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      62
      ·
      14 hours ago
      • The default ssh port moved if ssh has to be exposed to the Internet. No, this doesn’t make it “more secure” but damn, it reduces the script denials in my system logs, fight me.

      Gosh I get unreasonably frustrated when someone says yeah but that’s just security through obscurity. Like yeah, we all know what nmap is, a persistent threat will just look at all 65535 and figure out where ssh is listening… But if you change your threat model and talk about bots? Logs are much cleaner and moving ports gets rid of a lot of traffic. Obviously so does enabling keys only.

      Also does anyone still port knock these days?

      • josefo@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Literally the only time I got somewhat hacked was when I left the default port of the service. Obscurity is reasonable, combined with other things like the ones mentioned here make you pretty much invulnerable to casuals. Somebody needs to target you to get anything.

      • kernelle@0d.gs
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Also does anyone still port knock these days?

        Enter Masscan, probably a net negative for the internet, so use with care.

        • davidgro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          11 hours ago

          I didn’t see anything about port knocking there, it rather looks like it has the opposite focus - a quote from that page is “features that support widespread scanning of many machines are supported, while in-depth scanning of single machines aren’t.”

          • kernelle@0d.gs
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            Sure yeah it’s a discovery tool OOTB, but I’ve used it to perform specific packet sequences as well.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    14 hours ago

    Lol you can actually demo a github compromise in real time to an audience.

    Make a repo with an API key, publish it, and literally just watch as it takes only a few minutes before a script logs in.

  • kibiz0r@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    15 hours ago

    One time, I didn’t realize I had allowed all users to log in via ssh, and I had a user “steam” whose password was just “steam”.

    “Hey, why is this Valheim server running like shit?”

    “Wtf is xrx?”

    “Oh, it looks like it’s mining crypto. Cool. Welp, gotta nuke this whole box now.”

    So anyway, now I use NixOS.

    • pageflight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Good point about a default deny approach to users and ssh, so random services don’t add insecure logins.

    • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      I published it to the internet and the next day, I couldn’t ssh into the server anymore with my user account and something was off.

      Tried root + password, also failed.

      Immediately facepalmed because the password was the generic 8 characters and there was no fail2ban to stop guessing.

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        86
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Don’t use passwords for ssh. Use keys and disable password authentication.

      • PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        16 hours ago

        wow crazy that this was the default setup. It should really force you to either disable root or set a proper password (or warn you)

            • jatone@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              15 hours ago

              we’re probably talking about different things. virtually no distribution comes with root access with a password. you have to explicitly give the root user a password. without a password no amount of brute force sshing root will work. I’m not saying the root user is entirely disabled. so either the service OP is building on is basically a goldmine for compromised machines or OP literally shot themselves in the root by giving root a password manually. something you should never do.

              • steventhedev@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 hours ago

                Many cloud providers (the cheap ones in particular) will put patches on top of the base distro, so sometimes root always gets a password. Even for Ubuntu.

                There are ways around this, like proper cloud-init support, but not exactly beginner friendly.

        • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          16 hours ago

          Love Hetzner. You just give them your public key and they boot you into a rescue system from which you can install what you want how you want.

          • r00ty@kbin.life
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I think their auction servers are a hidden gem. I mean the prices used to be better. Now they have some kind of systrem that resets them when they get too low. But the prices are still pretty good I think. But a year or two ago I got a pretty good deal on two decently spec’d servers.

            People are scared off by the fact you just get their rescue prompt on auctions boxes… Except their rescue prompt has a guided imaging setup tool to install pretty much every popular distro with configurable raid options etc.

            • Björn Tantau@swg-empire.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              15 hours ago

              Yeah, I basically jump from auction system to auction system every other year or so and either get a cheaper or more powerful server or both.

              • r00ty@kbin.life
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                15 hours ago

                I monitor for good deals. Because there’s no contract it’s easy to add one, move stuff over at your leisure and kill the old one off. It’s the better way to do it for semi serious stuff.

      • cm0002@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        16 hours ago

        because the password was the generic 8 characters and there was no fail2ban to stop guessing

        Oof yea that’ll do it, your usually fine as long as you hardened enough to at least ward off the script kiddies. The people with actual real skill tend to go after…juicer targets lmao

        • Tablaste@linux.communityOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Haha I’m pretty sure my little server was just part of the “let’s test our dumb script to see if it works. Oh wow it did what a moron!”

          Lessons learned.

      • JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Lol ssh has no reason to be port exposed in 99% of home server setups.

        VPNs are extremely easy, free, and wireguard is very performant with openvpn also fine for ssh. I have yet to see any usecase for simply port forwarding ssh in a home setup. Even a public git server can be tunneled through https.

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          29 minutes ago

          Yeah I’m honest with myself that I’m a security newb and don’t know how to even know what I’m vulnerable to yet. So I didn’t bother opening anything at all on my router. That sounded way too scary.

          Tailscale really is magic. I just use Cloudflare to forward a domain I own, and I can get to my services, my NextCloud, everything, from anywhere, and I’m reasonably confident I’m not exposing any doors to the innumerable botnet swarms.

          It might be a tiny bit inconvenient if I wanted to serve anything to anyone not in my Tailnet or already on my home LAN (like sending al someone a link to a NextCloud folder for instance.), but at this point, that’s quite the edge case.

          I learned to set up NGINX proxy manager for a reverse proxy though, and that’s pretty great! I still harden stuff where I can as I learn, even though I’m confident nobody’s even seeing it.

      • stoy@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I ran a standard raspian ssh server on my home network for several years, default user was removed and my own user was in it’s place, root was configured as standard on a raspbian, my account had a complex but fairly short password, no specific keys set.

        I saw constant attacks but to my knowledge, it was never breached.

        I removed it when I realized that my ISP might take a dim view of running a server on their home client net that they didn’t know about, especially since it showed up on Shodan…

        Don’t do what I did, secure your systems properly!

        But it was kinda cool to be able to SSH from Thailand back home to Sweden and browse my NAS, it was super slow, but damn cool…

        • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 minute ago

          But it was kinda cool to be able to SSH from Thailand back home to Sweden and browse my NAS, it was super slow, but damn cool…

          That feels like sorcery, doesn’t it? You can still do this WAY safer by using Wirehuard or Tailscale. I use Tailscale myself to VPN to my NAS.

          I get a kick out of showing people my NextCloud Memories albums or Jellyfin videos from my phone and saying “This is talking to the box in my house right now! Isn’t that cool!?” Hahaha.

        • troed@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Why would a Swedish ISP care? I’ve run servers from home since I first connected up in … 1996. I’ve had a lot of different ISPs during that time, although nowadays I always choose Bahnhof because of them fighting the good fights.

          • stoy@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            They probably don’t, unless I got compromised and bad traffic came from their network, but I was paranoid, and wanted to avoid the possibility.