weird@sub.wetshaving.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 12 days agoEvery timesub.wetshaving.socialexternal-linkmessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1752arrow-down17
arrow-up1745arrow-down1external-linkEvery timesub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 12 days agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squareSneezycat@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up65·12 days ago“Accidentally” of course, I absolutely would never cat /dev/random on purpose just to see what happens…
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up27·12 days agoYou should really be using /dev/urandom though.
minus-squareBjörn Tantau@swg-empire.delinkfedilinkarrow-up14·12 days agoBut /dev/random is more surprising and not because it’s more random.
minus-squareNat (she/they)@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up6·12 days agoAren’t they the same now?
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 days agoIsn’t there arandom too?
minus-squarecaseyweederman@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up10·11 days agoI prefer aplay /dev/random, myself
“Accidentally” of course, I absolutely would never
cat /dev/random
on purpose just to see what happens…You should really be using /dev/urandom though.
But /dev/random is more surprising and not because it’s more random.
Aren’t they the same now?
Isn’t there
arandom
too?Of course
I prefer aplay /dev/random, myself