nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 days agoWhat's your favourite OS that does not use systemd?discuss.tchncs.deexternal-linkmessage-square236fedilinkarrow-up1706arrow-down124file-text
arrow-up1682arrow-down1external-linkWhat's your favourite OS that does not use systemd?discuss.tchncs.denutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 7 days agomessage-square236fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareLka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down2·7 days agoSo, running a program incompatible with a particular system leads to incompatibilities? Wow, who’d have thought…
minus-squaremittorn@masturbated.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up0arrow-down1·6 days ago@lka1988 why systemd needs some extra compatibility? If it designed to work, it must just work, not requiring changing evertyhing around
minus-squareLka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 days agoOk, let me spell this out for you: IF YOU RUN A PROGRAM THAT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH A CERTAIN PART OF THE CORE SYSTEM, DON’T BE SURPRISED WHEN IT LEADS TO INCOMPATIBILITIES.
So, running a program incompatible with a particular system leads to incompatibilities?
Wow, who’d have thought…
@lka1988 why systemd needs some extra compatibility? If it designed to work, it must just work, not requiring changing evertyhing around
Ok, let me spell this out for you:
IF YOU RUN A PROGRAM THAT IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH A CERTAIN PART OF THE CORE SYSTEM, DON’T BE SURPRISED WHEN IT LEADS TO INCOMPATIBILITIES.