• Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    Nice. Now they know how to not build that specific one

    Trial and error correction people

    The best thing is that these launchs are getting cheaper with time

    The falcon 9 has an internal launch cost per kilogram of about 1000 USD/KG

    If they get starship right (and all evidence points to it getting ready soon) internal launch cost is estimated to be between 200 to 300 USD/KG

    We are very close to seeing 25k USD or less tickets to space

    Get ready for the future bois, it won’t wait for you

    • Tsiolkovsky’all@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Oh c’mon.

      Cannot possibly spin “blew up randomly during test prep” as a positive outcome. They probably don’t know how not to build that specific one unless they happened to instrument the faulty prop system components - they know that it failed but likely not why or how to fix it.

      All evidence points to Starship having a super-finicky MPS that fails on the regular… which probably means they’re chasing performance by removing mass from the MPS and tank structure… which means either this design doesn’t work (totally possible) or that the as-built performance falls short of what was promised.

      If you want to stan for Musk, I guess everyone has a type and I’m not going to shame you over it… but blowing up during test prep is not a good news story.

      • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        23 hours ago

        I understand from your comment that, within your limited capacity, it is actually hard , next to impossible even, to imagine the benefits of having cheap orbital and suborbital transportation and infrastructure.

        I imagine it must be difficult living that way so I just want to say you are very brave by raising awareness to such disabilities, keep at it, champ, you are doing a great job

        • underwire212@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          How difficult is it to communicate to others without letting your ego get in the way? I swear, you people act like literal children sometimes haha

        • shoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          22 hours ago

          I understand from your comment that you’ve read too many sci-fi books to understand what a massive resource sink that would be with negligible benefit. It’s pretty basic physics.

          We’ve already got cheap transportation, look how that’s turning out for the planet. But I’m sure burning God knows how much energy to launch more junk into space will save the world.

          We’re already approaching a critical mass of private equity space trash in orbit, what’s a few more lowest-bidder megastructures? At least the ultra rich will get their life rafts while we burn.

      • Dudeonlemmy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        Why go anywhere in the world? It’s all about the experience man, 25k to have experienced being in space is an incredibly unique and cool experience is it not?

        • shoo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Because the world has actual things in it like people, wildlife, culture and history. Space has none of those things. Unless you’re there working as a scientist to study things that can’t be studied on earth, it’s pointless.

          As of now it’s a glorified roller coaster. At its best private space travel could be Disneyland in space. At worst it’s just rich people paying to be carried up mount everest for clout but with exponentially more resources wasted.