• Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    signal requires a phone number and won’t even allow you to send sms to those that aren’t on signal.

    its better, but still not great.

    • TeddE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      It used to function as a fallback SMS/MMS messenger (like how iMessage does) but when Google started moving to convert Android from SMS/MMS to RCS Signal made the hard decision to cut the fallback functionality rather than follow Google’s new framework.

      I personally hope once the dust settles Signal designs a RCS engine and restores the fallback functionality.

      • oppy1984@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Yeah killing the sms function was basically a deal breaker for me, no matter how much I tried I could only get three people to use Signal, the rest were all sms. When the sms feature was removed 2 of the 3 dropped Signal completely, so now the only person I know who still uses it is my mom and even she still flips back and forth between Signal and Google messages when texting me.

        I still have Signal on my phone and suggest it people when they ask how to contact me, but everyone just wants to text my phone number.

      • Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        if they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.

        i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          It’s arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext