• FooBarrington@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Spam isn’t a binary issue, where it either exists or doesn’t. It could very well be the case that, without requiring a phone number, there’d be far more spam (since it’d be far easier to automatically create new accounts).

    Again, do you have a better suggestion for spam & abuse prevention?

    And still, aside from that - it doesn’t really make sense to expect Signal to offer SMS integration just because it requires a phone number for spam prevention, when offering this integration would be detrimental towards the mission of Signal (offering secure messages).

    • Nima@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      it does make sense, actually. as they had that function when the app was first around. why do you think they have you sign up with a phone number in the first place?

      also, it’s not on me to solve every technical hurdle you make up. if you want to learn more about Spam Prevention methods, I can point you to some resources if you’re truly interested.

      I’m sorry that not everyone thinks Signal is a god app worthy of worship. its a message app, and its not the only one. it does stuff some people don’t like. including me.