Last year, China generated 834 terawatt-hours of solar power.

Which is more than the G7 countries generated, and more than the US and EU combined. In fact the only country group that generates more solar power than China is the OECD, all 38 countries of it.

Data: @ember-energy.org

Source: https://bsky.app/profile/nathanielbullard.com/post/3lsbbsg6ohk2j

  • Mihies@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Yes, of course I’ve meant it in a positive way - a way to replace coal and gas. But solar is not just positive, they are problematic when you couple them with nuclear for the simple reasons that solar is not reliable and you can’t throttle nuclear - they are like big ships, they require a lot of time to steer. Furthermore solar energy low price causes problems for nuclear higher prices. Which wouldn’t be a problem if solar was reliable and continuous (long winter nights much?). But it’s not, but you still need a reliable energy source. And so on. The pro solar panel crowd don’t understand many of these implications and go with simple “idiotic” and downvotes.

    • suigenerix@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Why wouldn’t solar and other renewables combined with batteries be better?

      It’s very early days, yet California recently had 98 days on renewables. That started in winter.

      What is it about renewables with batteries that you believe will fail, despite the mass adoption that is under way?

      Why will the projected, continued decline in battery prices and advances in battery tech not occur?

      Why would adjacent solutions, like the massive storage ability of vehicle-to-grid, be worse compared to nuclear?

      Why are so many “in the know” getting it so wrong?

      • Mihies@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        What batteries are you referring to? Do you realize the amount of energy those batteries would have to store? Perhaps somewhen in the not so near future, but today? Go ahead and show me a western city able to store a couple of days worth of energy. More realistically a week.

        • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          59 minutes ago

          OP sepcifically mentioned EVs. This sector is deflationary even in US, where better value/performance cars cost less every year. More dramatic deflation in less corrupt countries. Australia home solar costs under 1/3rd of US due to different politico-social corruption levels.

          EVs and home solar are a great match that permits going offgrid at substantially lower cost if an EV is parked at home during day. That same dynamic allows a society/community to power itself through solar+batteries, and EVs parked at work. It’s not a question of look at our corrupt obstructionist oligarchical monopoly state of societies for examples of lack of economic success as proof that it will forever be impossible.