• Eldritch@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I don’t trust Jack. But this does seem marginally interesting. Actually decentralized, no servers supposedly. We’ll have to see. Again I sure as hell I’m not going to trust dorsey. And he’s got it under some cringey edgelord “unlicense” license which basically appears to be MIT just with a different name. The actual concept seems intriguing. But definitely nothing to get excited about currently.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 minute ago

      One thing I personally like more about this than about Briar - routing of messages.

      It seems Briar exchanges state of the groups with the neighboring devices, they with their neighbors, and so on.

      That might take a few iterations (thus delay) to propagate a message from, say, one side of the crowd to another, and leave different members with different state all the time.

      While here, apparently, messages are routed further immediately. From my own toying around - not the best thing too, but initiating synchronization by sender\relay and not by recipient seems sane.

      Maybe should rewrite the toy to be nicer. It seems to be closer to real world things than I thought.

    • Josie@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      youtube-dl and yt-dlp are under unlicense. it’s just boilerplate legalese for public domain

    • Pro@programming.devOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      And he’s got it under some cringey edgelord “unlicense” license which basically appears to be MIT just with a different name.

      Bro, Public Domain.