• zarkanian@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    234
    ·
    2 days ago

    This part really stuck out for me:

    This is the latest example of a strange marketing strategy by AI companies. Instead of selling products based on helpful features and letting users decide, executives often deploy scare tactics that essentially warn people they will become obsolete if they don’t get on the AI bandwagon.

    If hype doesn’t work, try threats!

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      2 days ago

      Which is how you know they have a good product that they have full faith in.

      when they have to blackmail, threaten, coerce, and force people to accept their product.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      Threats work well for scams. People who couldn’t be bothered to move by promises of something new and better can be motivated by fear of losing what they already have.

      It’s really unfortunate psychology is looked down upon and psychologists are viewed as some “soft” profession. Zuck is a psychology major. It’s been 2 decades, most of the radical changes in which were not radical in anything other than approach to human psychology.

      BTW, I’ve learned recently that in their few initial years Khmer Rouge were not known as communist organization to even many of their members. Just an “organization”. Their rhetoric was agrarian (of course peasants are hard-working virtuous people, and from peasantry working the earth comes all the wisdom, and those corrupt and immoral people in the cities should be made work to eat), Buddhist (of course the monk-feudal system of obedience, work and ascese is the virtuous way to live, though of course we are having a rebirth now so we are even wiser), monarchist (they referred to Sihanouk’s authority almost to the end), anti-Vietnamese (that’s like Jewish for German Nazis, Vietnamese are the evil). And after them taking power for some time they still didn’t communicate anything communist. They didn’t even introduce their leadership. Nobody knew who makes the decisions in that “organization” or how it was structured. It didn’t have a face. They only officially made themselves visible as Democratic Kampuchea with communism and actual leaders when the Chinese pressured them. They didn’t need to, because they were obeyed via threat (and lots of fulfillment) of violence anyway.

      This is important in the sense that when you have the power, you don’t need to officially tell the people over which you have it that you rule them.

      So - in these 2 decades it has also came into fashion to deliberately stubbornly ignore the fact that psychology works over masses. And everybody acts as if when there’s no technical means to make people do something, then it’s not likely or possible.

    • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      For some odd reason, this calls to mind an emotionally immature parent trying to get their toddler to eat vegetables… no reason at all…

      • uzay@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        Just that the vegetables in this case are actually fastfood and gummibears.