• buddascrayon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Because unlike with the other tools you use the CEO of your company is investing millions of dollars into AI and they want a big return on their investment.

    • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I don’t think these CEOs have quite figured out that LLM developers are creating something that can more easily replace a CEO than a developer.

    • DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Return? No, there is no return on investment from AI. If there really was a return to be had from Devs, you wouldn’t have to force them to use it.

      This is a saving face and covering their asses exercise. Option 1 is “We spent the money, nobody’s using it, the bubbles gonna burst”, the other choice is “if we can ramp up the usage numbers before the earnings call, we can get some of that sweet investor money to buy us out of being mauled by our shareholders”.

      It’s shitty management, making shitty decisions to cover up their previous shitty decisions

      • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        That’s the point though. These CEOs don’t know that there is not going to be an “AI revolution”. They all think they are getting in on the ground floor of the next Google or Facebook. They genuinely believe that these “AI’s” are going to revolutionize the Internet.

        That’s exactly why Elmo went from “AI is too dangerous and development on it must be stopped” to “I’m gonna built the best AI ever and I’ll call it Grok cause I want everyone to think I’m a relatable sci-fi nerd.”