• 0 Posts
  • 331 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 12th, 2023

help-circle
  • Majority of linux users are on a monetized OS. Consultancy, extended service, feature implementation, fast support, donations, merch are all common monetisation methods across major linux distros and there is nothing wrong with any of them.

    There are very few distros funded solely by the maintainers they are usually hobby projects.


  • Fizz@lemmy.nztolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldMy nightmare
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I know that guy is a crazy tankie, I’ve see him around. What he brought up is a bunch of shit intended to waste time. He doesnt care about any of those things so trying to argue is a waste of time and most of its untrue or misleading.


  • Which ones dont monetize their OS? Its not that they are uniquely important. Its that its perfectly fine to monetize their own os. They are selling a service that is additional support for users that want it. Pretty simple stuff, you see users asking for this stuff all the time.

    Why shouldn’t they be able to offer additional paid support for their own distro? Why does it matter

    Poof them out of existence, and what, outside of their own direct projects, breaks?

    How is this relevant at all?


  • Hardware support and working with manufacturers to bring linux support, vendor support bringing mainstream apps to linux, advertising linux laptops and getting it in front of people all around the world, Wayland, gnome, accessibility, a ton shit way to much to list. Just because the improvements are done for Ubuntu doesnt mean they arent useful on other distros. Its free software after all the rising tide lifts all boats. Canonical arent a huge mega corp raking in cash. They cant compare to giants like redhat.



  • Fizz@lemmy.nztolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldMy nightmare
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    You do not seriously think all canonical has done is snaps and Gnome.

    Is building one of the most popular linux desktop environments and distros not enough to sell a paid support package to the users who want it? I dont think thats unfair.


  • before you know it you’ll have to raise these little computers as your children and be charged with murder when they die

    If you’re a pro life person then you’d probably consider this a life and consider these experiments murder. If you arent then I dont think you would see this as a conscious human brain. Following the abortion debate doesnt mean we have to take the conservative side it means you probably draw the line here in the same place you draw the line in the abortion debate.



  • This paper was published a few years ago. I remember reading through it because it sounded very scary. In its current state I dont think it crosses any ethical bounds as its less than 30days old with no lived experience or consciousness. The ethical line should probably follow whatever the abortion debate defines consciousness as. Which I think is 30 weeks

    It did spark a few ethics papers on the topic which turned out to be a horrible dry boring reads with seemingly no consensus.