I used to be an editor on there so have a lot of mixed feelings about it, there’s a lot of bullshit that goes on.

It’s good for hard sciences, but most articles on “soft” subjects like history do have a pro western liberal capitalist bias. Although the amount of bias usually depends on what senior editor decided he owns the article, despite “owning” articles being against the Wikipedia rules.

I’m pretty sure 200km of fibre isn’t going to be cheap either

It’s odd they found this in the unit the manufacturer sent them for review. With this kind of scam they would normally make sure the review models had the correct processor. I wonder if this was done by a supplier or subcontractor without them knowing.

And a monitor that supports usb-c, I assume.

How do you enforce the fines? Wouldn’t you have to invade the USA to enforce any meaningful fines?

I’d rather not see a great firewall of Europe.

I’d be happy to see them banned from doing business here though. Hit them where it hurts, their money.

How will this affect embedded os like freertos or vxworks? There are lightbulbs that have operating systems these days, am I going to have to show ID to turn on my light?

Seems like a good excuse for destroying evidence.

DoD: you just bombed the wrong Georgia!

ChatGPT: You’re absolutely right, and you’re right to call that out. Upon examination it does appear that there might have been a mistake with the coordinates of the missile strike. Let’s try again — this time we will double check before we launch any missiles 🚀

This is already in nightly, you can see it on the test instance here https://voyager.lemmy.ml/c/photography@lemmy.ml

I’ve looked into this from a UK perspective, partly because I’m in the market for a new 3d printer. Usual disclaimer that I’m not a lawyer, this is just a summary of what I found in my research, it could be completely wrong.

You can usually sue a company in a local court if they do business in your country, enforcement can obviously be an issue but if they have a local warehouse it can be enforced there.

In the UK there is a specific small claims track for small IP claims, it’s not expected for you to have a barrister, and cost orders are rare, so if you lose you don’t normally have to pay the opponents costs. This court can still grant injunctions, such as requiring them to release the source code, or preventing them from selling any printers.

The customer probably has standing to bring a claim as a third party beneficiary, this doesn’t seem to be entirely settled.

The way things are going we’re going to need ddr3 mobos.

Shall we play a game?

It’s almost impressive how tesla has managed to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

LetsEncrypt only does level one (domain validated certificates), it doesn’t offer organisation or extended validation.

Basically they only prove you control example.com, they don’t prove you are example PLC.

You must love cookie banners 😋

or have users earn additional votes for receiving positive votes on their comments

I found the slashdot system worse than the reddit/lemmy system, if you commented anything that offended the hive mind you got downvoted into oblivion and lost the ability to vote, which obviously ended up reinforcing the hive mind.

Downvotes don’t seem to be much of a factor in post visibility, at least in scaled mode?

Archiving a site inherently requires altering it, to change embed URLs, scripts, etc. The fact they had that capability was never in question.

Everyone seems to be ignoring the fact that he only did this in response to a malicious dox attempt.