little hilter needs his LIEbensraum

I’ll do it for half that.

Cool, can we make it the CEO?

Incredibly so, yes.

It’s Classified.

Yeah, and the people who pay those people tend to get really mad if they do that at work.

Ok, my main complaint about GDPR is that I had to implement that policy on a legacy codebase and Im pretty sure I have trauma from that.

Framework purchased a biotech company specialized in growing human analog homunculus for organ transplant, but the tech is based on Nazi experiments from WW2, so it’s kind of unethical.

People are mad about it, understandably. It’s all in the article.

Yeah I agree completely with that sentiment.

Maybe they didn’t know before, but they definitely know now. It’ll be interesting to see how they respond going forward.

I’m posting my take here before reading any comments, but I will be looking for validation or good counter arguments:

This feels like Framework admitting that the opensource community is too small to exclude anyone, or maybe that they feel they can’t exclude anyone because doing so would damage their ability to do business? I’m not picking up a “we love nazis” vibe, I’m picking up a “nazis are fucking everywhere, what do you want us to do, for fucks sake” vibe.

I don’t know how I feel about that yet.

I love crappy slapped together indi games. Headliners and Peak come to mind. Both have tons of bugs but the quality is there where it matters. Peak has a very unique health bar system I love, and Headliners is constantly working on the balance and fun, not on the graphics or collision bugs. Both of those groups had very limited resources and they spent them where they matter, in high quality mechanics that are fun to play.

Skyrim is old enough to drive a car now, but back then it’s main mechanic was the open world hugeness. They made damn sure to cram that world full of tons of stuff to do, and so for the most part people forgave bugs that didn’t detract from that core experience.

BG3 was basically perfect. I remember some bugs early on but that’s a very high quality game. If you’re expecting every game you play to live up to that bar, you’re going to be very disappointed.

Quality does matter, but it only matters when it’s core to the experience. No one is going to care if your first-person-shooter with tons of lag and shitty controls has an amazing interactive menu and beautiful animations.

It’s not the amount of quality, it’s where you apply it.

(I’ve had that robot game that came with th ps5 crash on me, but folding@home on the ps2 never did, imagine that)

This is survivorship bias. There’s probably uncountable shitty software that never got adopted. Hell, the E.T. video game was famous for it.

It’s like taping a knife to a crab. Redundant and clumsy, yet strangely intimidating

You’re using a lot of weasel words and zero sources for someone arguing we should all fact check things.

I’m not even saying your wrong, but your going to have to do a lot more than that to convince me that “they’re known for” everything you just said, because that sounds like you have a very specific beef with them that overshadows everything else they’ve ever done (in your estimation) and your projecting that as a universal truth, when really it’s not.

I respect your opinion, but there are certainly far more worse channels than there are better ones, and they’re known for being one of the better ones.

edit: If this is what you’re trying to say, I agree with you: https://lemy.lol/comment/21580850

It isn’t known for those things at all.

So they want to keep them terrified of losing their shitty, barely functioning status quo.

The reality is that these are the numbers the Republicans want , because it’s the numbers their billionaire owners want. ChatGPT is just accidentally letting us know how they’ve poisoned the models.