they’re not advocating for any of those, and they’re not committing a falacy.

so you recognize that this:

being vegan is one of the most significant reduction to greenhouse emissions that is within your personal choice

it’s not actually a good argument for veganism?

Creating demand for the alternatives funds their R&D and furthers their availability, which in turn leads to better products for lower prices, which makes further adoption much easier.

there is no causal link between any of those events, and increased demand decrease availability.

I don’t really believe what economists claim, v but you don’t even seem to know what they say in the first place

thank you. no matter how many times I point out the inefficacy of consumer choices or how I word it, I end up with bad faith and fact-avoidant responses like you got.

abusing user trust

here’s a sidechannel attack on your position: every use, even infringing uses, are fair use until adjudicated, because what fair use means is that a court has agreed that your infringing use is allowed. so of course ai training (broadly) is always fair use. but particular instances of ai training may be found to not be fair use, and so we can’t be sure that you are always going to be right (for the specific ai models that may come into question legally).