

You’re willing to pay $none to have hardware ML support for local training and inference?
Well, I’ll just say that you’re gonna get what you pay for.
You’re willing to pay $none to have hardware ML support for local training and inference?
Well, I’ll just say that you’re gonna get what you pay for.
lol yeah, the lemmy userbase is NOT an accurate sample of the technical aptitude of the general population 😂
You can get a Coral TPU for 40 bucks or so.
You can get an AMD APU with a NN-inference-optimized tile for under 200.
Training can be done with any relatively modern GPU, with varying efficiency and capacity depending on how much you want to spend.
What price point are you trying to hit?
The best part is that if any of them get taken down, another one will pop up on another instance :D
Currently, we’re trying to catch our breaths while stabbing ourselves in the lungs
Republicans? Ashamed?
I see you haven’t met many Republicans.
I honestly expect our ruling regime to attack and punish them for this. I’m not exaggerating.
Coming soon: a screwdriver and a soldering iron
I’m betting the PRC invades Taiwan inside of a year or two, and that orange boy does fucking nothing because “they didn’t pay enough”.
thing: Sequence[Any]
iirc is iterable, indexable, and reversible.
thing: Iterable[Any]
only guarantees that its iterable - and note that iterating can sometimes have the effect of consuming the iterable (e.g. when working with streaming interfaces)
I know what an iterable is. But I am talking about Type[Iterable]
, which iirc does not obey falsey eval when empty.
My point is that the second statement you presented can have the effect of evaluating emptiness of a Sequence (note: distinct from an Iterable), but that only holds true if the target of the conditional IS a sequence. I’m underlining the semantic difference that was elided as a result of falsey evaluation.
What the actual fuck even is this
You’re checking if mylist
is falsey. Sometimes that’s the same as checking if it’s empty, if it’s actually a list, but that’s not guaranteed.
This will never ever be used in a surveillance capacity by an administration that’s turning the country into a fascist hyper capitalist oligarchical hellscape. Definitely not. No way. It can’t happen here.
You guys should just do that anyways tbh
You’ll note that “liquor” was specified, not “liquor cabinet”
We’re dropping DEI for DUI, haven’t you heard?
Yeah… more like a decade at least, if we’re being honest. Even if we do a U-turn in 4 years (which, frankly, I doubt, because I’m not convinced we’ll even have elections, much less meaningful ones, very much less free and fair ones).
Also, I see you, fellow Bostonian 😉