I bought a OP 9Pro just before Oppo decimated the company. They moved from Oxygen OS to a poorly camouflaged version of Oppo Color OS and stripped out some of the features that made Oneplus what it was. Oppo also almost completely stopped fixing bugs, even some really serious ones that had been long documented. I recently bought a new phone and didn’t even consider Oneplus Oppo.

It seems to me that the only reason Oppo would do this is to preserve the revenue they get from selling customer data that should remain private. Otherwise why would Oppo care what OS people run on their hardware?

I’m no security expert and my biggest concern with self-hosting is making a configuration error in the OS or some app, or missing a critical update that allows someone access to my personal data. In order to reduce the attack surface and management requirements my network can only be accessed through Wireguard. The random open WG ports do not respond to unauthenticated packets, so someone would have to have access to my configurations to be able to get past my firewall, at least in the absence of some yet unknown vulnerability. Of course that won’t prevent mistakes being made on PCs (especially Windows) but it’s one less thing to worry about.

Wireguard clients on our PCs and phones make connecting and accessing media and files a breeze. There are no third parties involved so enshittification by some company’s security breach or sudden monthly fee isn’t going to happen.

I have a Bosgame mini-PC that is completely inaudible unless you get close to it. Power draw is <15 watts under light load meaning that even with the high electricity rates where I live it costs less than $3.50 a month to operate. I’ve avoided hard drives because I don’t want to listen to them whine, so no comment there. Two simultaneous 1080p Jellyfin streams increase CPU utilization by less than a percent and it still is under 5% with a couple of other Docker containers running.

Good luck setting everything up to your liking.

Let’s give credit where credit is due - This is what the GOP wants. They have complete ownership of ICE’s terrorist activities and applaud what is being done.

Republicans could reign this in in a couple of days if ICE didn’t have their blessing. The same is true if our corporate/billionaire media began referring to what’s happening as GOP, rather than ICE activity.

The Nazis used IBM, the GOP use Palantir.

FIFY: Jeff Bezos said the quiet part out loud - hopes that you’ll give up you won’t be able to afford a PC and will be forced to rent one from the cloud

Bezos would sell oxygen subscriptions if he could.

What do you find awful about the dashboard? Is there another automation system that has a better implementation?

That’s bad case of main character syndrome you got there.

Keep trying. Two others have posted here that they are seeing the hijack.

It’s has now been replicated. Maybe it’s you who “doesn’t understand any of this”.

Did you follow a link from another site?

They do it intermittently and always after following a link from another site.

The biggest problem with posting anything on Lemmy is that there’s always some ego on the Post Prevention Brigade who thinks every other person is an idiot.

It happens after following a link from another site, usually Lemmy.

Im basing it on months of irritation with their BS. Shows up often on Firefox with Ublock. Glad you’re not seeing it on your browser.

Started with it on a server but moved it to my Openwrt router. If the router’s up the tunnel’s up.

TMO has had IPV6 implemented for mobile devices for years. There’s no way they only implemented IPV4 on a home/business service that uses the same network and the same towers.

Does their current equipment (and yours) support IPV6? If so CGNAT won’t be involved.

Your WG network is a separate subnet. Add it to PAPERLESS_ALLOWED_HOSTS to allow access.

not that any of this is doable in the near future, since i’m behind cgnat and won’t get my colocated bounce server up until spring.

Doesn’t IPV6 allow direct external access even when cgnat is in use for IPV4?

When I was running a mesh topology I often had the same issue. Switching to a star topology fixed pretty much everything.