The software company has “Open” in their name and yet makes proprietary software, the first clue 🫠
I mention software freedom whenever I can.
Profile avatar is “kiwi fruit” by Marius Schnabel. CC BY-SA 4.0 | I am not affiliated with OpenMoji.
The software company has “Open” in their name and yet makes proprietary software, the first clue 🫠
If I obfuscate my code such that it’s very difficult to understand then in practice it’s like proprietary software, even with an open source license.
Correct me if I’m wrong but looking at the code isn’t enough to understand what a neural network will do (if these “AI” are using that, maybe they’re not).
I want 4k 144Hz 🤠
“Stargate” is already taken for another science fiction. You’ll have to pick another name.
That’s a damn shame.
Playing the game used to be the requirement to get content out of it, and no account needed.
CUDA being taken down a peg is the best part for me. Fuck proprietary APIs.
This is not an ad
Enter email to receive emails
I disagree, Mr Website.
I heard Windows was adding a “snapshot” and guessed that’s what they were doing, but uhh… are there really “AI Screens” hardware doing this too?
It’s not always obvious or easy to make what non-techies will find easy. Changes could unintentionally make the experience worse for long-time users.
I know people don’t want to hear it but can we expect non-techies to meet techies half way by leveling their tech skill tree a bit?
Techy people are a lot more likely to jump through hoops because that knowledge/experience makes it easier for them, they understand it’s worthwhile or because it’s fun. If software can be made easier for non-techy people and there’s no downsides then of course that aught to be done.
Pick one:
If there’s a chance of getting sued, yeah, but really my time would be better spent on mods or contributions to non proprietary games anyway.