cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/35973449

Archive article: https://archive.is/a602u

The platforms “are all facing this problem where the right wing has been on them repeatedly about content moderation and how they [shouldn’t] control any content,” said a lobbyist for Meta, who was granted anonymity because they weren’t authorized to speak for the company. “And now the tables are turned in some fashion, and people are all over them, saying you can’t allow this kind of content and that kind of content.”

  • criss_cross@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Wasn’t their entire thing that we needed free speech and shouldn’t let big tech be in charge of that?

    Oh that only applies when people say things they want to hear? Got it.

    • ignirtoq@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      As far as I’ve ever been paying attention, conservatives only argue in bad faith. It’s always been about elevating their own speech and suppressing speech that counters theirs. They just couch it in terms that sound vaguely reasonable or logical in the moment if you don’t know their history and don’t think about it more deeply than very surface-level.

      Before, platforms were suppressing their speech, so they were promoters of free speech. Now platforms are not suppressing speech counter to them, so it’s all about content moderation to protect the children, or whatever. But their policies always belie their true motive: they never implement what research shows supports their claimed position of the moment. They always create policies that hurt their out-groups and may sometimes help their in-groups (helping people is optional).

  • PhilipTheBucket@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Hopefully the idiots who run these tech companies will learn their lesson soon.

    “If the thing is free, you’re the product” applies just as much to dinners at the White House as it does to social media apps.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Right wing, you can’t control or censor social media.

    Right wing, you need to control and censor media

    • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Imagine what would happen if it happened again to another nazi in the near future. They would have no idea who to talk about or what to say.

      • db2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Of course they would. Hitler himself could appear and do the deed and those mouth breathers would still be like “the left did it!” Hell they’d probably think Hitler was a liberal.

  • matlag@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Is that a surprise? Don’t we know enough that when they talk about freedom of speech, they mean they should be allowed to insult and incite violence against minorities, but critics against them should not be allowed?

  • db2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Fuck Charlie Kirk, I hope hell is real so he can burn in it.

  • charade_you_are@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I never knew who this prick(kirk) was until he got shot in the neck and died instantly after a disgusting defense of gun rights. I’m glad I know who he WAS now. It’s soothes me when I think about his final words