Not necessarily a bad thing. A lot of new users to the fediverse.

  • jonne@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Surprising to me that Lemmy is only at 4.3%, it definitely feels very active to me.

    • F/15/Cali@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s incredibly active. It’s not gigagigant size, like masto, but it has a userbase large enough to survive for many years without an infusion. Reddit is still censoring lemmy sites, in case anyone else is curious

      • lordnikon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        People forget web forums were way smaller than lemmy and ran just fine and were very active. Lemmy has a very different use case to mastodon. Since you don’t need individuals to latch onto. We are having a discussion on lemmy as equals around a topic not followers of a person like how a Micoblog is designed to be.

  • Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    What am I looking at exactly? I see a cropped image, and mastodon is under 70%. Based on an educated guess and nothing more, I’m going to guess what you’re trying to convay is that in the pie that represents the total fediverse, mastodon used to account for more than 70%, and now smaller services are growing. So mastodons total pie share shrinks, as the pie grows in other areas.

    Is that about what you’re trying to say? Or am I way off?