misk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoAI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news, BBC findswww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square53fedilinkarrow-up1307arrow-down15
arrow-up1302arrow-down1external-linkAI chatbots unable to accurately summarise news, BBC findswww.bbc.commisk@sopuli.xyz to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square53fedilink
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·18 hours agoYes, I think it would be naive to expect humans to design something capable of what humans are not.
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·14 hours agoWe do that all the time. It’s kind of humanity’s thing. I can’t run 60mph, but my car sure can.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·13 hours agoQualitatively.
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·13 hours agoThat response doesn’t make sense. Please clarify.
minus-squarerottingleaf@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·4 hours agoA human can move, a car can move. a human can’t move with such speed, a car can. The former is qualitative difference how I meant it, the latter quantitative. Anyway, that’s how I used those words.
minus-squaremaniclucky@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 minutes agoOoooooh. Ok that makes sense. Correct use of words, just was not connecting those dots.
Yes, I think it would be naive to expect humans to design something capable of what humans are not.
We do that all the time. It’s kind of humanity’s thing. I can’t run 60mph, but my car sure can.
Qualitatively.
That response doesn’t make sense. Please clarify.
A human can move, a car can move. a human can’t move with such speed, a car can. The former is qualitative difference how I meant it, the latter quantitative.
Anyway, that’s how I used those words.
Ooooooh. Ok that makes sense. Correct use of words, just was not connecting those dots.