• chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Just don’t buy Seagate. Their drives consistently have the highest annualized failure rate on Backblaze reports ( https://www.backblaze.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/6-AFR-by-Manufacturer.png ), and is consistent with my experience in small anecdotal sample of roughly 30 drives. This results in a ripple effect where the failed drive adds more work to the other drives (array rebuild after replacement), thereby increasing their risk of failing, too.

    • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      38 minutes ago

      If you look at the data, Seagate is also some of their oldest drives, and some of their most used. Likewise, they have almost no WD drives, yet that’s what you recommend below.

      I’m not saying you should or should not buy Seagate drives, I’m just saying that’s not what you should be taking away from that data. What it seems to say is that Seagate drives are more likely to fail early, and if they don’t, they’ll likely last a while, even in a use case like Backblaze. Some capacities should be also avoided.

      That said, I don’t think this data is applicable to an average home user. If you’re running a NAS 24/7, maybe, but if you’re looking for a single desktop drive (esp if it’s solid state), it’s useless to you because you won’t be buying those models (though failure rates by capacity apply since they likely use the same platters).

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      A bit less than 20 years ago a new PC arrived in our home, and some of the letters on the drive inside it said “Seagate Barracuda”. And that drive lasted longer than the motherboard in that box (and the CPU’s integrated graphics started gradually failing a few years before that, so I was using a cheap discrete card).

      Point is, I have good associations with the brand, sad that it’s become this bad.

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        49 minutes ago

        Way back when SSD were prohibitively expensive for poor student me way back when, they came up with Momentus XT; I don’t know if they were the first hybrid HDD/SSD, but it was my first foray into flash storage. I had the earlier version with controller such that should the flash memory dies, I’d still have access to the HDD.

        It, was, glorious…

        I hear you. The brand is really not what we remembered them to be.

      • Ramenator@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        33 minutes ago

        In my home server my Seagates have been dying one after another, I have replaced each failed one with a Toshiba and they have been rock solid so far

      • chiisana@lemmy.chiisana.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        WD has been treating me well, but the most recent batch had been hgst he10 from server part deals from a couple years back so I can’t comment on the more recent drives.

      • Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Western Digital used to be great. Don’t know if they still are. I never had an issue with any of my HDDs from them (I only ever bought the high end stuff though)

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    1 day ago

    I had to send a Barracuda drive back recently.

    “It’s fine” said Seagate’s SMART analysis tools.

    “Clunk clunk clunk clonk” said the HDD.

    I know which of those results I trusted more.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Barracudas are SMR garbage nowadays, they’re coasting on their reputation of many years ago when they were actually decent hard drives for the price.

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I only wanted it for a Jellyfin drive. The one thing it could have been useful for and it even failed at that.

        Seems like you need to pay the extra for an Ironwolf drive to get an actual “just like the good old days” HDD.

      • AtariDump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        …when they were actually decent hard drives for the price.

        And had a five year warranty.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    ·
    2 days ago

    PSA to always run a full length SMART check for any drives you buy, even from OEM. The short test and log are not enough, I have bought faulty drives that someone had reset the logs and power on hours.

    All passed short SMART test, but failed long SMART test after only a few minutes. Found just one drive that the skrub forgot to wipe and the log showed 6 continuous years of power on usage.

    Even from OEM, you will at least know if the hardware is DOA which you can then RMA.

    • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Probably performs a good burn-in for them too.

      Do people still do that? Used to be common practice to power on equipment and let it sit, either idle or full-tilt, for a couple days before even starting to configure it. Let the factory bugs scatter out.

        • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          My parents bought a beach house (a bungalow on a postage stamp, before anyone gets an ideas that we’re some 1%ers) and it came with an old washer dryer. My old man put a single pair of jeans in the dryer and seemingly forgot about them. He says he did it for a timer. Leaves the house. Nobody there for a week. My mom comes in, dryer still running, jeans essentially translucent at this point. One of the things you can laugh at only because it wasn’t a tragedy.

      • AtariDump@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        I do; I use a four pass destructive run of badblocks on new drives before implementing them.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          29 minutes ago

          Yeah, we did that at my last company to make sure our hardware was up to spec. We deployed an IOT device for long term outdoor installations, so it needed to survive very hot temps. We had a refrigerator we gutted and added heat to, and we’d run a simulation with heavier than expected load for a couple days and tossed/RMAd the bad units.

          That was a literal burn in, but the same concept ak applies to pretty much everything. If you build/buy a PC, test the hardware (prime95 CPU test, memtest for RAM, etc). Put it through its paces to work out the major bugs before relying on it so you don’t have to RMA a production system.

    • BeardedGingerWonder@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      2 days ago

      Secondary PSA Seagate use some godawful numbering scheme on their SMART results, if you’re not aware of the fact you need a calculator understand the raw error count it will freak you the fuck out.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    Seems strange as its from several different retailers but seagate confirmed they where refurbished so seems a bit bait and switch but why would so many be doing it?

    • themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      2 days ago

      Either Seagate is doing it or all the retailers get them from the same source (which may not be Seagate) that is doing it or is contaminated by fulfillment pooling

      • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        The wholesaler where these are shipped from may have bought a large amount of hard drives from China and Co mingled the stock. Most logical explanation.

    • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      they confirmed they were refurbished, as well as the drives were OEM drives (meaning different warranty) so the problem is that someone 100% has a mixed assortment of storage. whether that was on Seagates end or the retailers end (more likely imo to be on the retailers end, as Seagate has their own refurbished drive market they run, and would only be a seagate problem if someone mistakingly shipped a bunch to a retailer) as they are their own source and is not affected by other sources.

  • shoulderoforion@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    The Retailers source the drives, and aren’t paying particularly too much attention, they’re not opening what seemingly looks like oem secured retail packaging, and simply having them dropshipped from the wholesaler