• Cyberwolf@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      If you think Xi Jinping is dictating what BYD does with their cars then you don’t understand the fundamentals as to why China managed to attract so much foreign investment and got to where they are now in the first place.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        Foreign investment was because of cheap labor and companies being subsidized by the communist government…

        BYD might make a better car than Tesla, but saying that a Chinese company isn’t “under the control of Xi Jinping”, the guy who crushed Hong Kong for having too much independence and wants to do the same with Taiwan, is laughable.

        • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          That’s actually a bit of a myth you know. Labour in China used to be dirt cheap 30 years ago but that’s not the case now. You need experts to build cars and they demand an appropriate salary. They probably don’t get paid as much as they would in the west but they’re not being paid pennies an hour either. However the idea that China is cheap has persisted.

          There’s a reason that Apple doesn’t make the iPhone there anymore. It was getting too expensive ie they were being asked to pay for a decent wage, and they weren’t prepared to.

        • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          4 hours ago

          but saying that a Chinese company isn’t “under the control of Xi Jinping”, the guy who crushed Hong Kong for having too much independence and wants to do the same with Taiwan, is laughable.

          Just take that sentence at face value and consider the ridiculousness of actually believing the guy alone has that amount of crushing power.

          You’re just regurgitating unfounded US propaganda which, this being Lemmy, is very unfortunate to see.

          • iii@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 hours ago

            the guy alone has that amount of crushing power.

            Nobody of right mind takes this at face value. This isn’t a pro wrestling heavyweight championship belt, with Jinping suplexing the Hong Kong protestors.

            It’s obviously as head of an autoritarian communist regime, using corona measures and a militarized police to suppress people for the extravagant act of desiring freedom from the CCP.

            • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              4 hours ago

              But even that is incorrect.

              Yes, Xi Jinping is powerful as the Chairman of the party, but the communist party of China is not the military, and there is a fair amount of decentralization in decision making.

              Further, the guy above goes “look at how Xi is suplexing Taiwan?!?!” even though he isn’t because guess what, he doesn’t actually have the power to do so.

              Also, none of this has anything to do with the topic of EV production, which is in the hands of a private company which largely operates independently of the government, much like millions of other companies that operate in China.

              Which is why I said the dude is just spewing brainless US state propaganda and Red Herring.

              • iii@mander.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                3 hours ago

                Further, the guy above goes “look at how Xi is suplexing Taiwan?!?!”

                I think you’re the only one reading it that way. The rest of us understand that it happens within a context of an autoritarian regime.

                which is in the hands of a private company which largely operates independently of the government

                Independent untill the party decides they’re not independent. (Eg).

                • Cyberwolf@feddit.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 hours ago

                  Independent untill the party decides they’re not independent. (Eg).

                  Again another non-sequitor that has nothing to do with the topic at hand. Nobody disagrees that China doesn’t like people publicly criticizing their government.

                  That has rigorously NOTHING to do with the normal operation of companies that do not engage with politics in China, which is what I was talking about before you barged in.

                  Also, it is the US that has been kidnapping people into unmarked vans and arresting people at airport, detaining them for however long, and deporting them to countries that aren’t their own for as little as having a meme criticizing the current US regime.

                  So really, which one is the dictatorship?

                  The sooner we stop seeing China as enemies, the better. We need them more than ever now that the US has decided to go full mask off.

                  BYD is free to operate as it wishes in China, along with several millions of other companies. And their products are good.

                  • iii@mander.xyz
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    3 hours ago

                    that do not engage with politics in China

                    There’s no such thing. A person nor company can’t unilaterally decide “not to engage with politics”, as politics engages with them in thousands of ways. The best they can do is self-censorship, which, even when successfull, is in itself a form of political engagement.

                    which one is the dictatorship?

                    False dichotomy 🙄

                    We need them more than ever now that the US has decided to go full mask off.

                    Who’s “we” in this case? And why would they “need” someone now, because of stuff in the US?