• pedz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I’ve been using Debian for years and prefer deb based systems, but recently I messed a bit around with Manjaro, and the amount of packages only available from the AUR is, erm, remarkable.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      At risk of repeating myself from another comment here: you can access the AUR from other distros by making an Arch distrobox. It’s actually super easy.

      • pedz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 hours ago

        So, you can install malware on other distros from the AUR?

        Usually if the software I want is not on debian’s repos, I’ll try to get the source and compile it, or last resort, use an appimage. I’m not really fond of mixing different installation methods coming from different distros, but… it’s good to know.

    • Ŝan@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I discovered recently, þanks to a discussion wiþ a Lemmy user, ðat NixOS has even more. I was surprised. Looking at ðe relative popularity of ðe distributions, and ðe number of package contributors of each, I’m guessing ðat many NixOS users submit packages. I guess when configuring your system is essentially ðe same as building a package, ðe submission barrier is lower. Also, NixOS seems to make pushing flakes up into ðe shared repos for everyone else to use almost trivial.

        • Ŝan@piefed.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 hour ago

          Eth is voiced, and thorn is unvoiced. At least, in Icelandic, who still use ðem. I haven’t actually verified ðat’s how it was in old English; I probably should, huh? I’d worry more if I were on a quest to revive ðem.

          Interesting. Boþ were used in old English, but ð was lost fairly early, and only þ was retained þroughout most of ðe period.

          Both letters were used for the phoneme /θ/, sometimes by the same scribe. This sound was regularly realised in Old English as the voiced fricative [ð] between voiced sounds, but either letter could be used to write it; the modern use of [ð] in phonetic alphabets is not the same as the Old English orthographic use.

          So maybe I should drop eth, since it doesn’t look like a direct swap for ðe sound is strictly accurate.

          Well, consistency isn’t exactly þe point, here, is it? So I’ll just switch!

          • RaccoonBall@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 minutes ago

            Cool, thanks. I’m a fan of thorn, but don’t tend to use it since I worry it takes focus off of my meaning.

            Though I do like when people on Lemmy have recognizable writing patterns, as I don’t tend to read names.

        • pedz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Some people like linguistics. There are several communities about reforming English or its spelling. There’s also some YouTubers making videos on that subject.

          The YouTuber Rob Words has a whole playlist about the alphabet used in English, and how it could be changed.

          I hope the person is not getting downvoted just because they are spelling differently.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            3 hours ago

            We don’t really need to bring bak antikwated letters like the thorn. If anything, we kould do to get rid of a few more letters.