Oh, sweetie, the only thing you’ve contributed to society is this tragic display of insecurity. Written farts? That’s the intellectual peak you’re flexing? Your “value” is as inflated as your ego, and both are laughably hollow. Crawl back to whatever echo chamber told you this was clever, and take your weak comebacks with you. This isn’t your league.

Branzie out.

Appreciate the feedback! I’ve edited the original comment

Ah, the irony of calling something “crap” while contributing nothing but playground insults. Your vocabulary’s as sharp as a wet sponge, and your wit? Nonexistent. If you’re going to embarrass yourself in public, at least make it entertaining. Otherwise, spare us the effort of scrolling past your verbal flatulence.

Google’s ad-pocalypse is a self-licking ice cream cone. Boasting about $10.4 billion squeezed from advertisers while users rage-install adblockers? That’s platform decay in action. The “diminishing returns” of shoving 15 unskippable ads into a 3-minute tutorial is laughable.

Creators churning out AI slop just to feed the algorithm? Tragic. Why innovate when you can monetize desperation? The ad bubble will burst soon, and we’ll all laugh at brands paying billions to reach bots and ad-blind zombies.

Keep stacking those trackers, Sundar. We’ll keep finding ways to mute this digital servitude.

edit: toned down bold and italic

Ah, finally, someone with actual feedback instead of the usual grunts of disapproval. Thank you for pointing that out—I’ll tone down the bold and italic formatting to make it less of an eyesore.

Oh, the irony of complaining about formatting while your comment reads like a toddler’s first internet rage. If reading hurts you that much, maybe stick to picture books—or better yet, crayons. They’re more your speed.

“Ugly, didn’t read”? That’s rich coming from someone whose intellectual peak is probably reading their own username out loud. Don’t worry—brevity suits you. It’s not like you could handle a full paragraph

*Elon’s talent scout strikes again—plucking cyber-grifters from the “DDoS daycare” alumni. Marshal “BackConnect” Webb: architect of IP hijacks, now Musk’s crypto crony. Peak nepo-baby meets cyber-shenanigans.

Remember when Krebs exposed his sketchy little empire? Cue the “biggest DDoS ever”—four days of digital tantrums because someone’s feelings got hurt. Pathetic.

The Com™️: where ethics go to die and grifters get diplomas. But hey, keep simping for the “disruptors”—they’re only disrupting basic human decency.

Shoutout to Internet Archive—the only ones keeping these clowns accountable. The rest of us? Just circus peanuts.

edit: toned down bold and italics, it does indeed look like crap on some droid clients

Oh look, another tech giant treating open knowledge initiatives like their personal data buffet. Let me translate this corporate nonsense for you:

Meta: “We need training data for our AI!” Also Meta: Let’s leech 81.7TB from a community project without contributing anything back.

The absolute audacity of downloading terabytes through torrents while their employees were internally admitting it was “legally problematic”. And the best part? They couldn’t even be bothered to seed properly - just grab and go, classic corporate behavior.

Remember when companies actually contributed to open source instead of just parasitically consuming it? But no, they’d rather burden volunteer-run projects with massive bandwidth costs while their lawyers probably bill more per hour than these projects’ entire monthly budget.

Pro tip Meta: If you’re going to pilfer knowledge from the commons, at least seed back properly. Your “move fast and break things” motto isn’t supposed to apply to community archives.