• sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I feel like I’m wasting my time replying to all these because it seems you didn’t even take the time to read them yourself.

    I’m here trying to learn about Delta Chat and why you think it’s a good app given the drawbacks of the approach they’ve taken. Over the years there’s been an incredible amount of messengers pop up, 90 million from Google alone and none have opted for SMTP. There’s surely a reason for that. From what I’ve learned, mostly thanks to Gemini, because holy fuck the Delta Chat website feels like something from 20 years ago and is purposely vague, the solution that Delta has gone for is just to add more layers. Again, something that the world has repeatedly opted against. I’m trying to understand why it’s considered a good idea in this case and why so many teams and startups have decided not to use this methodology until now?

    Jesus Christ, being curious shouldn’t feel like a chore.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s considered a good idea because it runs over omnipresent, already-existent, distributed infrastructure. In other words, for this particular chat app, you don’t even need to create an account. That is at very least an interesting and noteworthy feature.

      • xorollo@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        So if you don’t need to create an account, how do you know you’re talking to who you think you’re talking to?

        I can see this being valuable as a Lemmy style service where I’m sharing information and reading information but want to be anonymous. But not a good service if I want to talk to my mom about a sensitive subject and protect my privacy.