The Performing Right Society (PRS) has “commenced legal proceedings” against Steam owner Valve over the use of its members’ works on Steam “without permission.”

The organization claims that while games right across the spectrum use music to “transform play into emotional, immersive experiences,” Valve has “never obtained a licence for its use of the rights managed by PRS on behalf of its members, comprising songwriters, composers, and music publishers.”

PRS claims “many game titles which incorporate PRS members’ musical works are made available on Steam,” including “high profile series” such as Forza Horizon, FIFA/EA FC, and GTA.

PRS said that as it had sought to work with Valve about the licensing issues “for many years without appropriate engagement from Valve,” it has now issued legal proceedings under the UK’s s20 Copyright, Designs, and Patents Act 1988 and requires any game that uses PRS’ works to obtain a licence.

“The litigation will progress unless Valve Corporation engages positively with discussions and takes the necessary license to cover the use of PRS repertoire, both retrospectively and moving forwards,” the organization said in a press statement.

Dan Gopal, chief commercial officer, PRS for Music said: "Our members create music that enhances experiences and PRS exists to protect the value of their work with integrity, transparency, and fairness. Legal proceedings are not a step we take lightly, but when a business’s actions undermine those principles, we have a duty to act.

“Great video games rely on great soundtracks, and the songwriters and creators behind them deserve to have their contribution recognised and fairly valued.”

  • chunes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Once again reminding people that you can sue anyone for anything. Doesn’t mean it’ll go anywhere

  • ReluctantlyZen@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Huh? The game studios pay the licenses, the artists etc. Why on earth would you then hold the store accountable? This is double dipping. That’s like charging a CD store for selling your CDs.

    This shit is why the music industry is despised.

  • davitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    9 hours ago

    The price might not be worth it, but would be really funny if Valve just delisted the claimed games in the UK and notified the publishers that they need to remove the claimed music or resolve the licensing issue if they want their game back up. Instead of one tidy lawsuit, suddenly these guys are being contacted by the angry lawyers of hundreds of orgs they have existing contracts with.

  • IndustryStandard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Rothschild loses their lawsuit against Valve and instantly Valve gets more troll lawsuits against them. What are the odds.

  • villainy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What’s the VPN uptake in the UK these days, considering the state of government restrictions and surveillance lately? If Valve just said fuck it and pulled out of the market, would they even take a financial hit? Or would most of that revenue magically shift to other countries/currencies?

  • merc@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    15 hours ago

    My hate of the copyright-ownership side of Hollywood / Nashville / Atlanta, etc. has been burning white hot since the days that the RIAA was suing people using P2P networks. But, I had to admit that at least they could probably make a valid claim for copyright infringement. But this?!

    It’s interesting how it’s the “Performing Right Society” (which I’ve never heard of). The “performing” part of that suggests that maybe they have an issue with people sharing clips containing music, or live streaming games where they share music. But, again, why Valve? Sure, people can share clips with friends. And, occasionally you see developers streaming their games. But, nobody is really “performing” live streams on Steam. I suspect they just think Valve is rich and so they can strong-arm them and Valve will settle to make them go away. I hope they bit off more than they can chew. Valve is indeed rich, and they have a tendency to be stubborn. I think they might well fight, and fight hard.

    I wish a possible outcome was that the PRS ceased to exist. But, I suspect they’re like a flea or something, and even if you knock them off from this attempt to suck someone’s blood, you can’t kill them, and they’ll just find another victim.

  • 18107@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    77
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Are they going to sue to operating system owners next? What about the web browser that offers the steam installer download?

      • mghackerlady@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Or the dastardly USB Implementers Forum, who not only creates devices that allows those keyboards to function but a storage protocol commonly used by pirates!

  • stylusmobilus@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    23 hours ago

    This kind of lawsuit only makes things worse for musicians who are already struggling with making money performing and recording. This will be challenged, beaten and leave a bad image for artists as not everyone is going to draw logical conclusions from it.

    It’s not about artists anyway despite their claim, it’s about labels. The artists doing well are doing their own thing recording, touring, selling merchandise and making sure their followers are getting value for money. The traditional labels are losing control the same way the magazines did.

  • TheFinn@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    That’s like suing Spotify, Tidal, Amazon, etc for an artist in their library not licensing a sample correctly

    • balp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      That’s like suing Spotify, Tidal, Amazon, etc for an artist in their library not licensing a sample correctly

      No actually, it’s like suing Spotify, Tidal, Amazon, etc for an artist in their library licensing a sample correctly.

      Not that they like money from Steam despite the games having a licence for the music. If I read the article right.

  • entwine@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    21 hours ago

    This is the type of thing that pushes developers towards AI music generators and similar tools.

    Being a piece of shit human being should be enough disbar lawyers.

    • lobut@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      what’s sad is that I don’t think as many musicians even benefit as much from this as well … just the companies …

  • commander@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    22 hours ago

    These idiotic lawsuits. First of all, this isn’t even Valves responsibility. Second, Steam/Valve are small frys compared to Amazon/Apple/Google/Microsoft. In gaming they may be smaller than Sony and Nintendo and those two have full on closed software platforms. Steam is one software store among many on Windows, Linux, and MacOS. All these groups want to enshittify PC gaming. They want to enshittify personal computing in general. Turn pre-iPhone smartphone operating systems into iOS

  • d3adpaul77@lemmy.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    1 day ago

    everybody attacking Valve, maybe my tin foil hat is too cozy but it;s a concerted effort by the psychopathic elite to ruin our lives. may their glans be afflicted by a million paper cuts and a salty storm

  • nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 hours ago

    I feel like they should get a committee of people together who understand how technology works before they start making laws about it

    • Pman@lemmy.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      20 hours ago

      But that would make sense and be an effective way of making laws and governing and more importantly would stop those who haven’t meaningfully added to society from being able to easily profit from it in a way that others can’t.

        • mghackerlady@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          I mean we could go the catholic church method of multiple layers of verification, strict requirements for entry, and all encompassing moral framework. It isn’t guaranteed to be perfect, but it might just be good enough

  • reksas@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    all they do is demonstrate why no game should use licensed music ever. cant stream of make videos of those games either without having to worry about this shit.