It isn’t racist enough, so he has to take over and train it on nazi propaganda.

  • Canigou@jlai.lu
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    58 minutes ago

    Where is the “hide Musk/DOGE/Trump related posts” button ?

    EDIT : Found it ! (Damn, Lemmy is awesome 😊)

        • Canigou@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 minutes ago

          I’m still reading the old school press and listening to the radio. I’m just not on lemmy to read about it AGAIN… On top of that, it’s mostly absurd and inaplicable announcements. They crave attention so much, it’s painful to listen. Look at Musk’s video gaming scheme. Just pathetic…

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            31 seconds ago

            Ok, that’s fair. It is very hard to tell these days who is paying attention but overwhelmed and who is saying “this is all bad news, so I’m going to ignore it because I don’t like hearing about bad things.” The latter is the dangerous attitude. I’m glad it isn’t yours, but unfortunately Lemmy is not free of it.

  • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Elon’s $97.4B hostile takeover bid for OpenAI is less about “safety” and more about a billionaire’s corporate tantrum. The offer reeks of desperation—a laughable lowball for a company valued at $340B, dressed as altruism.

    Altman’s clapback—“buy Twitter for $9.74B”—is the perfect middle finger to Musk’s flailing empire. Remember when X became a $44B dumpster fire? Now he wants to drag OpenAI into his orbit of mismanaged toys.

    This feud isn’t about AI ethics—it’s two tech oligarchs weaponizing legal battles and PR stunts. Musk’s “open-source” crusade is safety theater while his own xAI hoards code. The only winner here? Lawyers billing hourly as the world burns.

    • boramalper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 hour ago

      To be clear (and as far as I understand), it’s not a hostile takeover bid because it cannot be: OpenAI is not a public company and thus doesn’t have a fiduciary duty to thousands to millions of shareholders but instead to a handful of big investors who can decide for themselves whether they want that Elon’s money or not. So this isn’t similar to what Twitter had been through but more like Elon teasing Altman I believe.

      • meowmeowbeanz@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        The distinction you’re making is valid but misses the forest for the trees. Whether OpenAI is public or not, Musk’s bid is a textbook power play, not a genuine offer. The lack of fiduciary duty doesn’t erase the intent—it amplifies it. This isn’t about shareholder obligations; it’s about Musk leveraging his wealth to reshape AI governance in his image.

        Comparing this to Altman’s jab at Twitter isn’t apples-to-apples. Altman’s point was rhetorical, highlighting Musk’s track record of overpromising and underdelivering. The “open-source” crusade Musk touts is hollow when xAI remains proprietary.

        This isn’t about legality or structure—it’s about influence and control. Dressing it up as altruism insults anyone paying attention.

  • NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Cage fight is no option anymore? 😎

    Well, maybe it is better this way. Let them ruin each other, and their companies. The world will be a better place then.

  • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Shortly after the news was announced, Altman posted on X: “no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want.”

    If only their slapfight meant something good for the world. At least, I don’t see everything collected in Musk’s hands.

  • beliquititious@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    “It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was,” Musk said in a statement provided by his lawyer Marc Toberoff to The Wall Street Journal. “We will make sure that happens.”

    I’ll believe that when I see it.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Ah so he’s again going to pay twice the amount of what it’s worth to then run of off a cliff and make it worth 20% of it’s real value within a years time?

    Seriously, why do people still believe anything this scammer says?

    • Goodmorningsunshine@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      37 minutes ago

      I mean, they believed everything Trump said because he was “a business man, not a politician” even though all he ever was was a failed business man. These people are functional at best - they ain’t bright.

  • transitinoir@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    135
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Genius mastermind shadow president plan:

    1. Buy company A for shit ton of money
    2. Ruin company A so it is worth 80% less
    3. Still have shit ton of money
    4. Repeat with company B
    • btaf45@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Ruin company A so it is worth 80% less

      Ruin country USA so it is worth 80% less.

    • phdepressed@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Buy a company mostly with other people’s money (he paid ~15B of the 44B offer) lose a lot, 70% or more but use it to win an election and gain 200B in profit.

      Musk is a salesman and he’s good at getting investors to get behind his crap. He’s never produced actual value but that doesn’t matter to stock values apparently.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Unfortunately, looks like buying Twitter was a very effective choice if you take profit off the priority list

      • fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 minutes ago

        Even if you don’t take profit off the list, it could well be that he had more financial success in these other companies because he uses twitter as promotion and propaganda platform…

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        40
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I mean, yeah. That was the entire point of him buying it: to control one of the biggest social media networks ever, and to use that to push and pull the public discourse however he wanted, in the interest of being a kingmaker. And it fucking worked.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 hours ago

          and sadly, the amount of people who use chatgpt to try and get factual information, is quite high… which makes this even more terrifying. It’s about systematically gaining control of communication and information.

          • Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            There’s tons of alternatives out there now that are as good or better.

            If he gets it then clearly it will be the Confederate States ChatGPT.

  • adarza@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    not even one-third of the valuation openai thinks they’re worth (up to 340b). and still below what investors thought in 2022 (157b). src

    i think this is old spice admitting that xAI is total bullshit and he’s giving up on making his own.

    • parody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      How stupid is this conspiracy theory:

      If it were a threat, like “this is what you’re gonna be worth if you don’t accept, anyway” depending on how power drunk he was feeling when hitting Tweet

    • atempuser23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Is xAI the same as grok? I really haven’t paid attention to Musk.

      Has there been any improvement in fsd since the introduction of the AI initiatives?

      Given what happened to twitter I can see this deal being finalized at 600billion.

    • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I thought this was because he’s still pissy they cut him out, but I guess his reasons can be multifaceted

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      i think this is old spice admitting that xAI is total bullshit

      Well, to be 100% fair, it’s all total bullshit.

      • zecg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I use a 16b reduction of deepseek-r1 on my pc at home and it’s definitely not total bullshit. It’s 10gb of local model that can solve mathematics and physics problems for you or program in python or bash. It doesn’t hallucinate (or I haven’t been able to elicit it), it’s aware of the extents of its knowledge. It works incredibly fast on an old ryzen 1600 with 6600xt. Having an open source reasoning AI that takes 10gb of SSD and about 13 gb of ram is so weird that the only thing weirder is seeing smart people dismiss it as bullshit out of hand.

    • jacksilver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Maybe below what investors or OpenAI thinks, but I think I’d take it. Unless they’ve got more secrets up their sleeve I don’t seem them ever being worth that much.

  • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Hahah he really hates Altman’s guts. Good. Love to see those two expend their energy on each other rather than on fucking all of us.

  • RobotZap10000@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    But remember, all of his wealth is only potential, not realized! He ackshually can’t afford to make the world a better place!

    • maplebar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      10 hours ago

      The best and most affordable way for Elon Musk to “make the world a better place” would be to drop dead.

    • stoy@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I mean an island with no internet connection isn’t that expensive to him

  • tonyn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    OpenAI’s Yahoo! moment. In a decade it’ll be worthless.